Foundation model API access vs. custom ML model build and train platform
Both are described as AI/ML services, so candidates treat them as alternative paths to the same outcome.
Deciding signal
Amazon Bedrock provides API access to pre-trained foundation models (FMs) from AWS and third-party providers — Anthropic Claude, Meta Llama, Amazon Titan, and others. You call an API; AWS manages the model infrastructure. It is the right answer when the scenario involves building applications on top of existing large language models without training or managing models. SageMaker is a platform for building, training, tuning, and deploying custom machine learning models. It provides compute infrastructure, managed notebooks, training jobs, hyperparameter tuning, and model hosting. It is the right answer when the scenario involves training a model on proprietary data, managing the ML training pipeline, or deploying a custom model. The decisive signal is whether a pre-trained foundation model is sufficient or whether custom model training is required.
Quick check
Does the scenario involve using an existing foundation model via API (Bedrock), or training and deploying a custom ML model on your own data (SageMaker)?
Why it looks right
SageMaker is the more established ML service and candidates apply it to generative AI scenarios where Bedrock — which requires no model training infrastructure — is the specific answer.